Reputation on Two Wheels

As we watch the remaining 179 riders amble across the lavender fields of central France, I see an epic race struggling to deal with a reputation tattered by decades of doping and subterfuge. Since the height of doping in professional cycling earlier this decade, Tour de France organizers and the International Cycling Union have toiled tirelessly to rid the sport of those who choose to cheat the system and undermine the sport’s integrity.

Photo from Cycling Weekly

Cycling is a beautiful sport. Pushing the limits of the human body – pedal stroke after pedal stroke – is exhilarating, self-affirming, and accessible to anyone, novice or pro. The professional sport is also a wonder to view as a spectator. A veritable team sport, the fabled maillot jaune is only achievable with the right combination of raw individual talent and a strong, smart supporting cast. Les domestiques are riders who relinquish their personal chances of victory every single stage to ensure that the team’s lead rider conserves the energy needed to scale mountains and reach the top step of the podium on the Champs Elysees in Paris. The science of aerodynamics and clever tactics make watching Le Tour a true marvel.

Beyond the beauty of this historic race, over the past few years, cycling garnered a new significance as an endeavor that inspires those afflicted with cancer throughout the world. Originating from his own personal battle with the virulent disease, seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong launched the LIVESTRONG campaign in 2003-04, using his worldwide celebrity status to raise awareness and financial support for cancer programs. In 2009, LIVESTRONG convened a massive global summit with more than 500 world leaders, corporations, non-governmental organizations and advocates to formulate strategies to fight the disease. Armstrong’s story and presence as a sporting giant continue to inspire people and their families fighting cancer each and every day.

Mixing the powerful plot of inspiration and darker storyline of doping worries me. I count myself among those who derive energy from Mr. Armstrong. Losing three grandparents and my mother to cancer, as well as supporting my father through his recovery from leukemia, his superhuman status powered me through many a dark time.

So as we enter the final week of this magnificent journey through France, I continue to see stories alleging a connection between the clean image of Armstrong’s raw power and the dark, cowardly shadows of doping. As an attorney, I am trained to seek the truth in the interest of justice. That said, I worry as to what we’ll find, if anything at all, and what damage will be done in an extensive public search of the global giant. This is the one case where I hope every consideration is given to preserving reputation. This isn’t Marion Jones, Ben Johnson, Floyd Landis, or Tyler Hamilton. Lance’s reputation transcends athletics.

When following the story, just think about the millions who LIVESTRONG when the going gets rough and look to Lance for a spark to crank the pedals over once more.

Post to Twitter

Share
This entry was posted in Industry & Current Events and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Reputation on Two Wheels

  1. Tim says:

    The damage is already done, to a large extent. There has been so much mud flung at Armstrong over the years that inevitably some of it sticks. I don’t know whether he is innocent or not, but the frequency and severity of the allegations continue to damage the sport, no matter what the actual truth is.

    http://thearmchairsportsfan.wordpress.com/

  2. seanfindlen says:

    Tim — Couldn’t agree with you more. It’s a sad issue, no matter how you look at it. I’ve heard the stories so many years that I, like you, cannot differentiate the truth from sensational mud. Thanks for your comment.

  3. The issue of Lance is a difficult one. I’m hoping he is innocencent, and yet that niggling doubt is also there.

    This is his last Tour, and I think it highly unlikely he will be caught now, so rumours and circumstantial evidence are likely all that will be left, but reputations are ruined on less.

    It’s sad – sport needs its heroes, and Lance is one of the greatest. In the end, I think I shall simply choose to remember him that way, regardless of the rumours.

  4. seanfindlen says:

    Beate — Well stated. Circumstantial evidence is usually too light to win a trial. But in the court of reputation, all is factored in. I appreciate your comment.

  5. Doug Flora says:

    Interesting that Lance’s reputation issues don’t seem to have hampered the Livestrong campaign

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free